Litigation

Motion to Change Venue Denied Despite Being Unopposed (NY)

In Francoise Mervil v. Eric Johnson and Marcia St. Urbain, Judge Francois A. Rivera denied Defendants’ unopposed motion to transfer venue because the only evidence in support of the Defendants’ motion constructed of inadmissible hearsay. Plaintiff, Francoise Mervil (“Mervil”) commenced a personal injury action against the Defendants in Kings County Supreme Court, alleging Urbain was negligent...Read More

Lights Out On Lamp, Court Sheds Light On Service Of Process (PA)

In recent case, Gussom v. Teagle, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court revisited the issue whether a lawsuit should be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s lack of effort to complete service – regardless of Plaintiff’s intent. On July 25, 2016, Rasheena Gussom and Maurice Teagle were involved in a car accident. Two months before the statute of limitations expired, Gussom filed a civil complaint against...Read More

Superior Court Holds Fair Share Act Does Not Apply If Plaintiff is Not Found Liable (PA)

In Spencer v. Johnson, 2021 WL 1035175 (Pa. Super. Mar. 18, 2021), the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an opinion with serious implications on the interpretation of the Fair Share Act.   By way of background, Pennsylvania courts had previously long adhered to the doctrine barring recovery for contributory negligence, which held that if a plaintiff’s own negligence contributed even 1% to his...Read More

COVID-19 Business Interruption Insurance Coverage is Far from Settled in Pennsylvania

Needless to say, COVID-19 business interruption coverage has been a hot topic for insurers and policyholders alike. This past week, the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgement in favor of policyholder plaintiffs and denied the defendant insurers’ motion for summary judgement in a class action lawsuit seeking coverage in Timothy Ungarean v. CNA et al. (further analysis...Read More

Manufacturer’s Substantial Business Supports Finding of Specific Jurisdiction

On March 25, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decisions in Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eight Judicial District Court et al., and Ford Motor Co. v. Bandemer. By way of brief background, in both cases, the states exercised jurisdiction over Ford in products-liability actions stemming from auto accidents. In both cases, the Ford involved in the accident was brought to the state via the...Read More

COVID-19 Illness is a Reasonable Excuse for Default (NY)

Solomon v. Gun Hill Assoc Trust, No. 24150, 2021 WL 923114 (Bronx Cty. Sup. Ct. Feb. 26, 2021) is a personal injury case, wherein Plaintiff alleged damages after a trip-and-fall in a driveway leading to a parking lot jointly used by several businesses. Defendant Dunkin’ Donuts Franchising, LLC (“Dunkin”) previously moved for summary judgment on the grounds that – by virtue of its franchise...Read More

A Connecticut Auto Dealer in Pennsylvania’s Court: Personal Jurisdiction over the Internet (PA)

Does the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have personal jurisdiction over an auto dealer in Connecticut? This was the question recently examined by the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas in D&S Auto Sales v. Commercial Sales & Marketing. The Defendant, a Ford dealership located in Mystic, Connecticut filed a preliminary objection to a claim of faulty service and repair of a vehicle...Read More

Motion to Transfer Venue for Forum Non-Conveniens Cited COVID-19 Concerns in Philadelphia County

The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas recently granted a motion to transfer venue to York County, PA in the Arceo et. al. v. AMF Bakery Systems, et. al. lawsuit. The motion to transfer venue pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens derives from rule Pa.R.C.P. 1006(d)(1), which states “or the convenience of parties and witnesses the court upon petition of any party may transfer an...Read More

NYPD Traffic Officer Traffic Owed No Special Duty to Plaintiff Struck by Taxi

On November 1, 2012, an NYPD traffic officer was directing traffic at the intersection of 3rd Avenue and East 10th Street in Manhattan, New York, after the traffic lights were non-operational due to Hurricane Sandy. As the officer was manually directing traffic, a collision occurred at the intersection between a motorcycle driven by the Plaintiff and a taxi. Subsequently, in Mendez v. City of...Read More

Ruff Witnesses: Pennsylvania Court to Analyze the Use of Emotional Support Animals During Trial

Testifying at Trial can be stressful for anyone. So stressful that some Courts agree to have emotional support animals present during trials. Recently, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District, granted a petition for allowance to appeal in which the Supreme Court will consider if the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s decision to permit a dog to accompany a...Read More