News & Of Interest

Another Covid-19 Victory for Insurers, This Time in New Jersey (NJ)

In a short, terse opinion, a federal judge in New Jersey ruled this week that owners of Wendy’s, T.G.I. Friday’s, Marriott, and Hilton franchises cannot recover for losses caused by Covid-19-related shutdowns. The decision adds to the growing amount of case law on this issue which has significantly favored insurers over policyholders. In Manhattan Partners, LLC v. American Guarantee &...Read More

No Vacancy: Structures on Property Can Disqualify Coverage (PA)

In a recent Western District of Pennsylvania case, Morton v. Gardner, the court addressed what constituted vacant land under the insurance policy at issue. By way of background, after a dead tree on the defendant’s property fell onto the plaintiff’s vehicle, an issue arose as to whether the defendant’s insurer was required to pay for the damage. At the time of the incident, the property was...Read More

COVID-19 Illness is a Reasonable Excuse for Default (NY)

Solomon v. Gun Hill Assoc Trust, No. 24150, 2021 WL 923114 (Bronx Cty. Sup. Ct. Feb. 26, 2021) is a personal injury case, wherein Plaintiff alleged damages after a trip-and-fall in a driveway leading to a parking lot jointly used by several businesses. Defendant Dunkin’ Donuts Franchising, LLC (“Dunkin”) previously moved for summary judgment on the grounds that – by virtue of its franchise...Read More

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Upends Consumer Protection Laws, Now Sharply Favoring Plaintiffs (PA)

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently overturned decades of established law in the consumer protection area, resulting in increased exposure to defendants in consumer transactions. The 4-3 decision in Gregg v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc. overturned decades of precedent which formerly required a plaintiff to show the state of mind of the actor with respect to a false or misleading...Read More

Law Practice in a Post-COVID World

We won’t be seeing a pre-COVID world any time soon. But a post-COVID world? That seems a bit more realistic, as vaccinations become more prevalent and we progress toward herd immunity. What will the practice of law look like, once COVID19 subsides, regular travel comes back, and in-person interaction resumes? Which remote techniques we use will stay, and which will fade away? My article...Read More

A Connecticut Auto Dealer in Pennsylvania’s Court: Personal Jurisdiction over the Internet (PA)

Does the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania have personal jurisdiction over an auto dealer in Connecticut? This was the question recently examined by the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas in D&S Auto Sales v. Commercial Sales & Marketing. The Defendant, a Ford dealership located in Mystic, Connecticut filed a preliminary objection to a claim of faulty service and repair of a vehicle...Read More

Motion to Transfer Venue for Forum Non-Conveniens Cited COVID-19 Concerns in Philadelphia County

The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas recently granted a motion to transfer venue to York County, PA in the Arceo et. al. v. AMF Bakery Systems, et. al. lawsuit. The motion to transfer venue pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens derives from rule Pa.R.C.P. 1006(d)(1), which states “or the convenience of parties and witnesses the court upon petition of any party may transfer an...Read More

NYPD Traffic Officer Traffic Owed No Special Duty to Plaintiff Struck by Taxi

On November 1, 2012, an NYPD traffic officer was directing traffic at the intersection of 3rd Avenue and East 10th Street in Manhattan, New York, after the traffic lights were non-operational due to Hurricane Sandy. As the officer was manually directing traffic, a collision occurred at the intersection between a motorcycle driven by the Plaintiff and a taxi. Subsequently, in Mendez v. City of...Read More