News & Of Interest

Multidistrict Litigation For COVID Claims To Come?

The most significant insurance issue of the Covid-19 pandemic has been insureds’ claims for business interruption coverage resulting from the forced closure of their businesses around the country. This issue alone has sparked hundreds of lawsuits spanning nearly every jurisdiction in the country. After arguments last week, the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation (the “JPMDL”) is now set...Read More

Eastern District of Pennsylvania Acknowledges Kvaerner is Still Good Law (PA)

The Eastern District of Pennsylvania in a declaratory judgment action, In re Shelter Structures, Inc., recently reaffirmed that Pennsylvania law typically does not provide coverage under a CGL policy for faulty workmanship. The underlying facts alleged that Shelter violated various building codes in the design and construction of an aircraft hangar. The aircraft hangar collapsed, destroying an...Read More

WCM Successfully Opposes Defendant’s Motions to Dismiss and Remand (PA)

In Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company v. Pediatric Associates of Westmoreland Ltd, WCM Partners Robert Cosgrove and Colleen Hayes successfully defeated defendant Pediatric Assoc. of Westmoreland, Ltd.’s (“PAW”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Remand to State Court.  By way of brief background, plaintiff Harleysville Worcester Ins. Co. filed a declaratory judgment action...Read More

Default is not a Total Loss (NY)

In a personal injury action, plaintiff Castaldini claims personal injury when a propane tank exploded at the home of defendant Walsh. Upon defendant’s failure to answer, plaintiff’s motion to enter default judgment was granted by the trial court, and the case was sent to inquest for a trial on damages. At the inquest trial, plaintiff testified as to his injury and submitted a written sworn...Read More

Statute of Limitations and Pollution Exclusion at Play for Toxic Tort Coverage Analysis (PA)

The Western District of Pennsylvania recently determined that a number of insurers did not owe coverage for hundreds of bodily injury claims brought forth in a toxic-tort action. In Allegheny Ludlum,  LLC. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, et al., the District Court granted the defendants’ motions for summary judgment after determining that the plaintiff’s claims were brought too late and...Read More

Incidental Business Connections Are Insufficient to Establish Venue (PA)

The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently tackled a civil procedure issue that frequently crosses the minds of defense counsel: improper venue. According to Pa. R.C.P 1006(e), improper venue must be raised in the defendants’ preliminary objections to plaintiff’s complaint or the objection will be waived. In Kanevsky v. Revolution Ice Rink LLC, the plaintiff slipped and fell while playing ice...Read More

Despite Error, Insurer Escapes Liability for UM/UIM Coverage

In Beach v. The Navigators Ins. Co., No. 1550 MDA 2019 (Pa. Super. Ct. Sept. 11, 2020), the plaintiffs sought UIM coverage under an automobile insurance policy issued to their employer. The dispute centered on the applicable limits of the UIM policy. The question as to the applicable UIM limit arose out of an error the insurer made when renewing the policy at issue. Beaches’ employer sought to...Read More

Disrupting New York’s Labor Law (NY)

Labor Law 240, often referred to as the Scaffold Law, was passed in 1885 to enforce various safety protocols to prevent slips and falls for construction workers working at heights. Court rulings interpreting the Scaffold Law imposed little responsibility on injured employees, making it difficult for employers to cite comparative negligence to avoid liability. The Scaffold law, which creates an...Read More