In <em><a href="http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2012/2012_00645.htm">Quintana v. The New York City Housing Authority</a></em>, the plaintiff was injured when he slipped and fell while attempting to climb over a mound of snow created along the curb of the sidewalk by NYCHA’s snow plow. The First Department held that, in the absence of evidence that the mound obstructed the crosswalk or was of such magnitude at the corner that it was more reasonable for a pedestrian to cross the street where plaintiff made his attempt, NYCHA could not reasonably have foreseen that a person in the circumstances in which plaintiff found himself would have acted as he did. Moreover, even assuming that an issue of fact exists as to whether the crosswalk was blocked by the mound, plaintiff was not in an “emergency situation,” and had other, albeit less convenient options for crossing the street, including walking back down the block, rather than crossing over the mound outside of the crosswalk.
Thanks to Ed Lomena for his contribution.
For more information, contact Denise Ricci at firstname.lastname@example.org