top of page

News

One Prior Incident is Insufficient to Establish Notice

May 8, 2009

Share to:

In the matter of <i>Egar v. Congregation Talmud Torah</i>, the court dismissed the case filed by the plaintiff who tripped over the temple's “eruv” wire. The “eruv” wires were strung 15 to 18 feet above ground, creating a symbolic walled courtyard. The court found that neither the congregation, who constructed the wire courtyard, nor St. John’s Episcopal Hospital, where the accident took place, had constructive notice of a recurrent dangerous condition, despite the fact that an eruv wire fell in a different location approximately one year prior to the plaintiff’s accident. The court focused its opinion on the principle that a single prior occurrence does not constitute a regularly recurring condition that the defendants would be aware of.
Thanks to Lora Gleicher for her contribution to this post.
<a href="http://www.crownheights.info/index.php?itemid=18003">http://www.crownheights.info/index.php?itemid=18003</a>

Headshot of Staff Member
Button
Button
Button
Button

Contact

bottom of page