top of page

News

Puppy Love? Only in New York...

January 4, 2012

Share to:

The well known gossip columnist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Adams">Cindy Adams</a> has a tag line that reads "only in New York kids, only in New York."  Few thoughts seem more on point in light of this new <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/paw_and_order_dHoAd6GXT1W1e5bDb26jKN">lawsuit</a> filed in New York's Civil Court -- a court which, for lawyers, would be one of the lower <a href="http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-information.html">circles</a> of Hell if Dante were writing today.  In the case of <em>Elena Zakharova on behalf of her dog Umka v. Ranging Rover</em>, Zakharova seeks pain and suffering damages for Umka, a <a href="http://www.akc.org/breeds/brussels_griffon/">Brussels Griffon</a>, who was bred in a puppy mill.  The lawsuit seeks pain and suffering damages for Umka, which would be a novel result since as a matter of New York law dogs (regretabble as it might seem) are merely property and not persons.  Will the civil court entertain this lawsuit?  Or will it be dismissed as more bark than bite?  Stay tuned to see what happens next!
For more information about this post, please contact Bob Cosgrove at rcosgrove@wcmlaw.com.
<div></div>

Contact

bottom of page